Market Capitalization:2 233 316 245 042,7 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:115 473 141 689,04 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,06%
ETH:10,08%
Market Capitalization:2 233 316 245 042,7 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:115 473 141 689,04 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,06%
ETH:10,08%
Market Capitalization:2 233 316 245 042,7 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:115 473 141 689,04 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,06%
ETH:10,08%
Market Capitalization:2 233 316 245 042,7 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:115 473 141 689,04 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,06%
ETH:10,08%
Market Capitalization:2 233 316 245 042,7 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:115 473 141 689,04 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,06%
ETH:10,08%
Market Capitalization:2 233 316 245 042,7 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:115 473 141 689,04 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,06%
ETH:10,08%
Market Capitalization:2 233 316 245 042,7 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:115 473 141 689,04 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,06%
ETH:10,08%
Market Capitalization:2 233 316 245 042,7 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:115 473 141 689,04 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,06%
ETH:10,08%
Market Capitalization:2 233 316 245 042,7 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:115 473 141 689,04 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,06%
ETH:10,08%
Market Capitalization:2 233 316 245 042,7 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:115 473 141 689,04 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,06%
ETH:10,08%
Yes

Trump Issues a Hard Warning: Nations Ignoring SCOTUS Risk Severe Tariff Counterattacks

crypthub
Trump Issues a Hard Warning: Nations Ignoring SCOTUS Risk Severe Tariff Counterattacks

Trump’s Tariff Warning

President Trump warned that any country that refuses to enforce a U.S. Supreme Court decision will face steep retaliatory tariffs. The statement directly ties SCOTUS compliance to U.S. trade policy, making judicial adherence a condition for normal trade. Failure to comply could trigger swift economic penalties.

Historical Context

Earlier tariffs targeted dumping, IP theft, or national‑security issues, not legal compliance. Trump's past measures on steel, aluminum and Chinese imports used Sections 232 and 301. Adding “SCOTUS compliance” introduces an unprecedented legal trigger.

Implications

Experts say the move blurs sovereign judicial authority with economic coercion and may clash with WTO rules. Companies may need to revise contracts and dispute clauses to limit exposure. Allies such as the EU, Canada and Japan view the threat as an infringement on their sovereignty, while opponents could use it to fuel anti‑U.S. sentiment.