Market Capitalization:2 199 344 496 825,8 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:57 911 565 332,29 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,48%
ETH:9,86%
Market Capitalization:2 199 344 496 825,8 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:57 911 565 332,29 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,48%
ETH:9,86%
Market Capitalization:2 199 344 496 825,8 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:57 911 565 332,29 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,48%
ETH:9,86%
Market Capitalization:2 199 344 496 825,8 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:57 911 565 332,29 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,48%
ETH:9,86%
Market Capitalization:2 199 344 496 825,8 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:57 911 565 332,29 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,48%
ETH:9,86%
Market Capitalization:2 199 344 496 825,8 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:57 911 565 332,29 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,48%
ETH:9,86%
Market Capitalization:2 199 344 496 825,8 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:57 911 565 332,29 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,48%
ETH:9,86%
Market Capitalization:2 199 344 496 825,8 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:57 911 565 332,29 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,48%
ETH:9,86%
Market Capitalization:2 199 344 496 825,8 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:57 911 565 332,29 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,48%
ETH:9,86%
Market Capitalization:2 199 344 496 825,8 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:57 911 565 332,29 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,48%
ETH:9,86%
Yes
>>David Bailey, the founder of Nakamoto, predicts that the failure of the BIP-110 fork is a positive development for Bitcoin.

David Bailey, the founder of Nakamoto, predicts that the failure of the BIP-110 fork is a positive development for Bitcoin.

crypthub
David Bailey, the founder of Nakamoto, predicts that the failure of the BIP-110 fork is a positive development for Bitcoin.

Cancellation of BIP-110 Proposal

David Bailey announced that the BIP-110 soft fork proposal is no longer moving forward. He described the cancellation as a strong signal, calling the failed effort an “incredibly bullish” event for Bitcoin. Bailey characterized the underlying debate as a form of “hostile takeover attempt” by certain developers.

The Nature of BIP-110

BIP-110 was a proposal intended to impose strict new limits on transaction data added to the Bitcoin network. Its goal was to reduce unnecessary data clutter, which some viewed as distorting the network’s function as currency. The rules would have capped outputs and limited various data types, though the changes were set to last only one year.

Lingering Network Concerns

The cancellation brought temporary relief to the community. However, debates over network capacity and data bloat persist. Concerns remain regarding rising transaction fees due to features like "ordinals" and "runes." Experts continue to warn about potential regulatory pressure or future attempts to split the Bitcoin network into competing versions.