Market Capitalization:2 889 494 616 256,2 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:103 887 366 430,14 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,4%
ETH:11,53%
Market Capitalization:2 889 494 616 256,2 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:103 887 366 430,14 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,4%
ETH:11,53%
Market Capitalization:2 889 494 616 256,2 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:103 887 366 430,14 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,4%
ETH:11,53%
Market Capitalization:2 889 494 616 256,2 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:103 887 366 430,14 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,4%
ETH:11,53%
Market Capitalization:2 889 494 616 256,2 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:103 887 366 430,14 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,4%
ETH:11,53%
Market Capitalization:2 889 494 616 256,2 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:103 887 366 430,14 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,4%
ETH:11,53%
Market Capitalization:2 889 494 616 256,2 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:103 887 366 430,14 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,4%
ETH:11,53%
Market Capitalization:2 889 494 616 256,2 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:103 887 366 430,14 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,4%
ETH:11,53%
Market Capitalization:2 889 494 616 256,2 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:103 887 366 430,14 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,4%
ETH:11,53%
Market Capitalization:2 889 494 616 256,2 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:103 887 366 430,14 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,4%
ETH:11,53%
Yes
>>A software glitch that caused a Cardano chain split has prompted the FBI to investigate a potential attack.

A software glitch that caused a Cardano chain split has prompted the FBI to investigate a potential attack.

crypthub
A software glitch that caused a Cardano chain split has prompted the FBI to investigate a potential attack.

Chain Split Incident

The Cardano network experienced a split on Friday after a malformed ADA delegation transaction activated a legacy software bug, resulting in a brief partition of the chain. The problematic transaction was generated by an AI tool used for staking operations. This bug temporarily divided the network into separate branches.

Aftermath and Concerns

Staking pool operators swiftly upgraded their node software to close the vulnerability and restore a single chain. Nevertheless, the incident raised worries about orphaned transactions and the risk of double‑spend attacks. Ongoing monitoring is required to ensure full resolution.