Market Capitalization:2 334 647 196 444,5 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:101 802 760 976,12 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,26%
ETH:10,18%
Market Capitalization:2 334 647 196 444,5 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:101 802 760 976,12 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,26%
ETH:10,18%
Market Capitalization:2 334 647 196 444,5 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:101 802 760 976,12 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,26%
ETH:10,18%
Market Capitalization:2 334 647 196 444,5 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:101 802 760 976,12 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,26%
ETH:10,18%
Market Capitalization:2 334 647 196 444,5 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:101 802 760 976,12 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,26%
ETH:10,18%
Market Capitalization:2 334 647 196 444,5 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:101 802 760 976,12 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,26%
ETH:10,18%
Market Capitalization:2 334 647 196 444,5 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:101 802 760 976,12 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,26%
ETH:10,18%
Market Capitalization:2 334 647 196 444,5 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:101 802 760 976,12 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,26%
ETH:10,18%
Market Capitalization:2 334 647 196 444,5 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:101 802 760 976,12 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,26%
ETH:10,18%
Market Capitalization:2 334 647 196 444,5 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:101 802 760 976,12 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,26%
ETH:10,18%
Yes
>>Moving Past JPEGs: Why the Debate on Ordinals Reflects a Struggle for Bitcoin's Permissionless Future

Moving Past JPEGs: Why the Debate on Ordinals Reflects a Struggle for Bitcoin's Permissionless Future

crypthub
Moving Past JPEGs: Why the Debate on Ordinals Reflects a Struggle for Bitcoin's Permissionless Future

Bitcoin Network Debate

The conflict surrounding BIP-110 and BIP-444 highlights a deep divide in the Bitcoin community regarding the network's role as a neutral data protocol versus a managed financial ledger. This disagreement centers on whether Bitcoin should prioritize technological neutrality or adopt curated governance mechanisms.

Philosophical Divide

An ideological rift is emerging over BIP-110, often linked to BIP-444, as advocates debate the implications of introducing structured financial features into Bitcoin's core protocol. Proponents argue for enhanced functionality, while opponents emphasize the risks of compromising decentralization and neutrality.