Vitalik concedes that Ethereum layer‑2 solutions no longer make sense.

crypthub

about 3 hours ago

Current Landscape

Vitalik Buterin revived debate on Ethereum’s L2 relevance, noting two key facts. L2 development to stage 2 and interoperability has lagged far behind expectations. Meanwhile L1 is scaling, fees are low, and gas limits are slated to rise sharply by 2026.

Rethinking the L2 Vision

He argues the original “branded shard” concept no longer fits because L1 itself is expanding. L2s cannot meet the security and responsibility of true shards, so a new purpose is needed. Instead of viewing L2s as extensions, they should be seen as a spectrum of solutions.

Guidance for L2 Projects

Vitalik suggests L2s either specialize in extreme scaling beyond any future L1 capacity or adopt a minimal stage‑1 role, especially when handling ETH assets. Others can prioritize tighter security or looser ties, letting users choose based on needs. Maximal interoperability with Ethereum is encouraged, but each L2 must define its unique value beyond mere L1 extension.