Market Capitalization:2 340 455 603 395,3 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:84 098 785 481,84 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,51%
ETH:10,73%
Market Capitalization:2 340 455 603 395,3 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:84 098 785 481,84 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,51%
ETH:10,73%
Market Capitalization:2 340 455 603 395,3 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:84 098 785 481,84 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,51%
ETH:10,73%
Market Capitalization:2 340 455 603 395,3 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:84 098 785 481,84 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,51%
ETH:10,73%
Market Capitalization:2 340 455 603 395,3 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:84 098 785 481,84 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,51%
ETH:10,73%
Market Capitalization:2 340 455 603 395,3 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:84 098 785 481,84 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,51%
ETH:10,73%
Market Capitalization:2 340 455 603 395,3 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:84 098 785 481,84 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,51%
ETH:10,73%
Market Capitalization:2 340 455 603 395,3 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:84 098 785 481,84 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,51%
ETH:10,73%
Market Capitalization:2 340 455 603 395,3 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:84 098 785 481,84 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,51%
ETH:10,73%
Market Capitalization:2 340 455 603 395,3 USD
Vol. in 24 hours:84 098 785 481,84 USD
Dominance:BTC 58,51%
ETH:10,73%
Yes

The Congressional Research Service has mentioned XRP in the same context as Bitcoin and Ethereum.

crypthub
The Congressional Research Service has mentioned XRP in the same context as Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Congressional Research Service Publication

A new Congressional Research Service (CRS) report dated April 3 2026 cites XRP alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum in official federal guidance. The document reflects coordinated input from the SEC and CFTC, marking the first written congressional mention of XRP. Analysts describe this as a historic acknowledgment rather than speculation.

Digital Commodity Classification

The CRS paper defines “digital commodities” as crypto assets whose value stems from system functionality and market dynamics, not from managerial efforts. It explicitly lists Bitcoin, Ether, XRP, and Solana as examples of such commodities. Under this view, these assets do not confer profit rights, passive income, or ownership, and are therefore not investment contracts.

Regulatory Impact

By placing XRP in the digital‑commodity category, the report influences ongoing debates about U.S. crypto regulation. Lawmakers may use this classification to delineate authority between the SEC and CFTC. The formal CRS reference strengthens XRP’s position in future legislative and policy discussions.

Community Response and Disclaimer

Crypto community members see the CRS mention as validation of XRP’s long‑standing utility and growing institutional relevance. Observers note the trend of XRP appearing in high‑level regulatory dialogues. This summary is informational only and does not constitute financial advice; readers should conduct their own research.